Workplace Report (February 2001)

Features: Law at work

Agency workers

The EAT has held that an individual recruited by an agency to work for a specified company could be held to be an employee of that company. The company in question exercised a sufficient degree of control over the employee. He was legally bound to comply with all reasonable instructions and requests made by the company, which thus had day-to-day control over the employee's activities

(Motorola v Davidson [2001] IRLR 4)

This information is copyright to the Labour Research Department (LRD) and may not be reproduced without the permission of the LRD.